There are many different whiskey and spirit related events available to the consumer as well as to those in the service industry who wish to learn more about the spirits they pour. Before we look at the future of these events, we need to look at their history and understand how they came into existence.
Thirty years ago there were no such events for consumers and very few for those in the industry. In the mid-1990s there was a growing interest in Bourbon and other whiskeys. The Bardstown Bourbon Festival had proven that consumers would travel quite a distance and pay money to not only learn more about Bourbon but also meet the people who made their favorite spirit.
I believe it was Malt Advocate that put together the first event that would allow consumers to meet the distillers and sample their whiskey without having to make the trek to Kentucky and the first “WhiskyFest” was born. Now there are many other events built on the same model. The magazine brought distilleries together in a city – New York or Chicago for example, rented event space where the distillers had booths to pour their products and hand out information and maybe even glassware if they chose to do so. The distilleries would bring in people like Booker Noe, Parker Beam, Jimmy Russell and Elmer T. Lee to work the booth and talk with consumers. They would pour their whiskeys and maybe introduce a new premium product to the consumers at the event. Because there were not really that many American distilleries at that time the organizers would include Scotch, Irish, Canadian and Japanese distilleries in the event so the consumer would have a plethora of choice in the four hour event. There is no doubt that these events helped create the Bourbon boom we have now.
These events were for profit events. The organizer would charge the distilleries a fee for a booth and the consumer a ticket price. There were also sponsorships sold. At the same time the organizers had many expenses. Besides the obvious expenses of the event space and food there were items such as proper licenses, insurance advertising and marketing and of course staff salaries to get everything organized and done. Money was made but I doubt that anyone was getting rich off the events. These events were expensive for the distilleries as well. They had not only the cost of the booth and its presentation, they had the cost of the whiskey poured; the cost of people working the booth; the cost of transportation getting everything there and the cost of anything given to the consumer such as glassware. The consumers would pay a ticket price and the price of the ticket was a balancing act of keeping the price low enough that a consumer would pay the price but also high enough to pay the bills and make some money.
In the early days of these whiskey events they were beneficial to both the distilleries and the consumers. They gave distilleries a chance to market directly to their biggest fans. They helped build the reputations of the distilleries’ common brands as well as their premium and super-premium brands. Sales increased with the exposure. There were other factors that helped create this explosion of sales but events were definitely a part of the explosion. Consumers had a chance to talk with industry people in a way that had never really happened before. The education level of the consumer rose. The organizers made a few dollars by helping make this connection between consumer and manufacturer. It was a winning situation all around.
Times have changed. The original distilleries are selling everything they have and are working hard to meet the demand. They don’t need the expense that comes with such events. Why should Four Roses pour a special release when they will sell every bottle already and still have consumers complaining because they did not get a bottle? Justify to stock holders that you gave away a case of your new expensive release that could have made more money for the stock holders and made that many more consumers happy. Now don’t get me wrong, the distilleries need to make a profit or else they go out of business and we lose another brand line and choice. This attitude is not corporate greed, but responsibility to stockholders. This means that the organizers have a harder sale to get them to buy space at the event. It has become less likely that the big name people are at the event. The Master Distillers and well know Brand Ambassadors may pass on the event to do something for special customers or in foreign markets. The consumer becomes less likely to attend if all they are getting are tastes of products they can purchase in the lobby bar and the person working the booth is someone who was hired two weeks ago to work the booth. Things look bleak for the future of these events.
There is hope that whiskey events will survive but there are going to have to be some changes in thought by all concerned. For the organizers they are going to have to stop looking at the big distilleries as a major source of income. They may have to start charging little or nothing to get booth space if they want these distilleries to send a Jimmy Russell or a Julian Van Winkle. They need to concentrate upon the distilleries that need to sell their brands but also to remember that these distilleries don’t have deep pockets either.
The distilleries like Peerless, Limestone Branch, Rabbit Hole and Starlight need that consumer exposure more than Jim Beam or Brown Forman. These are the distilleries the organizers need to help promote.
The big distilleries need to keep a hand in these events for public relation purposes and should still be willing to have a presence at the events. They need to remind consumers that they have plenty of great whiskeys that are still available and not that everything they pour is some hard to find special release. They need to get people like Fred Noe and Bernie Lubbers in front of consumers and let them know they care about their loyal customers and want to meet them.
Finally, the consumers who attend these events needs to quit thinking that only the hard to find and expensive whiskeys are what they want. Consumers should appreciate a pour of Evan Williams at the event because they got to share it with Charlie Downs. They should be happy that they got to meet Corky Taylor and his young distiller Caleb Kilburn when they just released their first two year old rye and cherish that memory in the years to come when Peerless has grown to be a popular brand. They should be happy to meet Steve Beam and discuss not only his fine whiskeys but his rich heritage at Limestone Branch. It is not all about getting to drink premium whiskey, it is also about learning about what is out there and how to appreciate them.
The future of whiskey events is bleak if the organizers and consumers expect things to continue to go on as they are. It is going to take some change in focus on the consumer and the distilleries, but it is possible to continue to have whiskey events promoting products and educating consumers.
Photos Courtesy of Maggie Kimberl
August 21, 2017 at 1:15 pm
As always, interesting observations, Michael. I would like to address one sentiment you made, and that is the assertion that, “They (the distilleries) don’t need the expense that comes with such events.” As someone who’s managed a whiskey brand and hosts an annual whiskey festival, I have to say that such a statement – made by either you, or held by whiskey brand managers – is enormously short-sighted. Building and maintaining a brand has everything to do with increasing awareness, initiating trial, and telling your story to the right audience. You stop doing that and your market share is sure to erode.
Certainly, many producers are, “…selling everything they have and are working hard to meet the demand”. But that’s going to change within a few short years. Everyone is putting down more and more stock, and more and more distilleries are entering the business. If you’re a successful whiskey brand, this is not the time to relax and count your profits. Stop promoting now, and you will soon find that you’ll need to invest a helluva lot more to rebuild your brand later than if you just stayed the course now. Think of it as periodic maintenance on your car. Ignore that warning light on your dash at your own peril.
There’s something to be said about ‘fishing where the fish are’. Well-run whiskey events allow brand owners to engage directly with their most-avid supporters. Withdraw from that arena and you’re giving your competition carte blanche to earn your customers’ business.
August 21, 2017 at 2:56 pm
I agree completely as to what you say about promoting the brands and I can assure you the distilleries will continue to do so. They will do so in the most cost efficient manner and these whiskey events are not very cost efficient. You can see the distilleries are already working on better solutions and one thing they are doing is holding their own whiskey event. the Bourbon Affair is an event that promotes brands but in this case it is actually the KDA that earns any profit so the profits go into the pockets of an organization that promotes their interest. It is a win/win situation for the distilleries. They still have event contact with their fans and the money spent for the event is better justified to stockholders. I think organizers of these events need to realize this and adapt. Rising costs for tables so you can give away free whiskey is a bad thing as far as the distillers are concerned.
August 21, 2017 at 4:41 pm
Cost of whiskey poured is really inconsequential. You’re usually talking 2-3 bottles of each expression presented. I’d agree that the cost of tables at these events are (for the most part) are getting out of hand. Some are attributable to rising overhead, but most are raising prices because of an organizer’s desire to be in parity with event ‘leaders’.
August 21, 2017 at 5:02 pm
I disagree with you about the cost of the whiskey because so many people expect you to pour the rare products i.e. Pappy, BT Heritage collection, etc. and those are in short supply. Every time Julian pours a bottle for free at one of these events he is loosing that sale to a person in a liquor store and that pisses off the consumer who shops there. This makes going to an event less attractive to him and Preston. The same could be said for Buffalo Trace or Wild turkey or Jim Beam or Heaven Hill or any of the others who have to pour their rare products such as William LaRue Weller, Tradition, Parker’s heritage or Booker’s rye at these events.
I would agree with you if all they were expected to pour was their core brands but that is not the case.
August 22, 2017 at 2:43 pm
Hi Michael, a good take on this and I agree with many of your sentiments, its now time for a change in the industry to allow for the smaller brands to have a shot at the consumer. Events like Dave Schmeir’s and Marty Duffy’s “Indie Spirits Fest” are part of this new movement, “WhiskeLive has opened up to the small distilleries as well. One interesting comment on your timeline: when the first WhiskeyFests started up, a bourbon was had to come by, they were primarily all Scotch, as this was the original MaltAdvocate mission. I remember seeing Four Roses for the first time thinking, “what are they doing here?”, right as they were rising out of their past stigma. It didn’t take long for that to change.
September 4, 2024 at 5:21 pm
And The Scotch Malt Whisky Society tastings back then were great! Whiskies of the World is also been more supportive of smaller brands, providing more reasonable fees. Whiskyfest is insane and dying. Too expensive for everyone.
September 15, 2017 at 4:05 pm
Interesting read. As a consumer (only barely related to the industry through my brother Mike)I see the points made by all sides. I love my bourbon(s) but, I’m not a blogger – attending every event trying to make a name for my opinion nor, do I live near anyplace likely to have an “Event”. So, how do you get the “me’s” involved? The last “Event” (and only events) I have ever attended was the Evan Williams booth at the BASS Tournaments I attended. The first one, I was attended to by a person of importance (I think it was Craig Beam – he knew Mike and we had decently long conversation about Mike, Bourbon and Fishing) the second was less than impressive.
February 27, 2024 at 6:49 am
Whiskey Tasting Las Vegas – Welcome Exhibitors! We are thrilled to invite you to be a part of the Nth – Ultimate Whisky and Spirits Experience at Wynn Resorts in Las Vegas. This exclusive event is the perfect platform for brands to showcase their finest spirits to a captive audience of whisky and luxury spirits aficionados.
September 4, 2024 at 3:30 am
While I agree with many of your sentiments, I have been running a world known charity whisky event for several years, and there ways to make these events better for everyone involved. If you charge the brands too much then they don’t want to take part. That makes sense. If you charge the guests too little you may attract a crowd that premium brands may not enjoy pouring for (it’s not fun to get glasses pushed in your face asking for the most expensive or oldest all night long).
First the event needs to decide who it’s market is, and then pair appropriately with the brands. I tend to have a more expensive event which is geared to premium consumers, which leads to brands pouring more premium whiskies. It’s a win for both consumer and brand. But I must disagree when you say that there is a big expense to pouring a premium pour. Since you mentioned Pappy, let’s say they pour the 20. Sure it may sell for $2000 on secondary, but how much does the brand get per bottle sold? 150? I would argue getting pours to more fans keeps them engaged, and the cost is not great. Can’t see share holders crying too much over $150.
That said I do agree there is a change in what the future holds for these events, but hope that there continue to be fun events for everyone.
September 4, 2024 at 4:02 am
Whisky Events like Whisk(e)y and Barrel Nite introduce the brands to more than consumers, but also the people who serve them. This event is definitely affordable for brands. Are the brands and expressions wise enough to seek the opportunities and reap the rewards? Well, some!
If brands and/or conglomerates have nothing to promote but antiques, then their other mainstay expressions are likely to be forgotten or remembered for what each doesn’t have enough of. Yet, what about what they do for less?
As new brands, innovations, technologies and ideas come to fruition, they will need a platform to present how palatable other expressions are to the changing market. The shows offer a place for bartenders, conglomerates, consumers, distributors, and retailers to compare, imbibe, observe, and respond to an ever evolving market.
Those shows that recognize how to promote and provide the proper mix of elements ought to make a reasonable profit. Yet, too many big brands are being scuttled by social media. However, the shows offer the most convenient place to compare to find out what works and what won’t. It’s all in the mix. Influencers are tasting!
If you must entice a bartender or consumer to your table, then a few jewels ought to be a consideration. There is more to be made. Ultimately, tasting the whiskies before you buy into them is always easiest. Regrettably, the big brands seem clueless as to how to do it when the market is so saturated with both new products and innovative promotion points.
In the end, what a bartender or consumer likes remain the issue, but also what their contemporaries like. The olfactory and taste profiles are key, but whether they should merge and have relative uniformity is subject to debate. Should what you nose be what you taste or should there be surprises?
Consumers differ. If you don’t remember how it noses and tastes, then you’re less likely to buy it. Yet, in a sea of good, there is always better for less. The brands and some consumers know it! The question is ought they promote that? Or leave it to the bartenders, brands and retailers to mix and/or promote with their magic?
Ultimately, who will train them and where? An educated consumer knows what they want, even if it seems to have flaws. Some shows are better platforms and values than others, just like whisk(e)y. Cheers to fears, but kudos to those who take to the tables and attract more market share.
September 4, 2024 at 5:45 pm
Great post! My three points: 1. The events are more important than ever for bringing in younger audiences, as we face Millennial and Gen Z being a more discerning crowd than Gen X. Gen X drank and drinks, but the next two are indeed drinking less quantity and choosing their brands more specifically, and Gen Alpha will follow suit. This creates great opportunity for upstart and lesser known brands to be discovered, let alone the need to feed the classic brands with continuity. Liquid to lips is indeed expensive, but it works. And these event organizers are serving everyone best when the event itself is a marketing effort that serves the organizers interests as well as the producers and the attendees without price gauging, like your KDA example. John and Amy were building the Malt Advocate brand, not just making event revenue. As a brand builder, I am constantly navigating this for my clients, and I believe in it. The greed of the organizers must be kept in check for it all to work.
2. As a whiskey bar owner, and supporter of these events for the last 20+ years, I look at them as a focal point for my own business. Having these events in town gets all of the locals riled up and excited, so there’s an important ripple effect for the local whiskey economy. As Whiskyfest tickets sored, that actually helped my own events because so many people wouldn’t pay that price (and indeed, after years of building that event, they’ve now abandoned San Francisco). The networking that happens in and around the event is great, and it has provided me great opportunities to host historic moments. We had Lincoln and Wes Henderson launch Angel’s Envy at Elixir, with Wes telling me they finalized the blend just before coming to Elixir and handing me and John Hansel the first samples (I still have it). We were able to have Jimmy and Eddie Russel in town to launch our first Wild Turkey private barrel because of leveraging their event appearance. And we had a hell of a Dave Pickerell memorial a year after he spent his last night on earth pouring Hillrock for Elixir customers. None of these events would have been possible without Whiskyfest. I’m looking forward to the string of Whiskies of the World events coming up in a couple of weeks.
3. These events bring the industry closer together by allowing for networking in and around the event. Sure everyone is working their butts off to execute the event and the activations, dinners, and account visits they coordinate around it, but getting to see the other members of the community on the road helps everyone stay connected and aware, learning from each other and creating opportunity. That can’t be understated.
The past glut of these events is already starting to cull the herd, and I’m sure the best will survive. I just hope we see some more innovation to keep them interesting.