Sometimes I let my mind wander about a subject and today, I pondered the subject of whiskey legends. I have always said that in distilling history, there are two types of history – the verified facts and marketing legends. I thought I would look at some of the legends today.
The marketing legends are useful in that there can be a grain of truth in the history. Let’s start with the origin legend that Elijah Craig invented Bourbon. He was an early distiller and a Baptist minister. This is verified truth. However, I have not found any contemporary source to support that he invented Bourbon. The story comes from the 1870s when prohibitionists were attacking the distilling industry and the industry liked the idea that a Baptist minister created Bourbon. My argument against this legend is that it would not have taken thirty years for Bourbon to be advertised in a newspaper. The earliest mention of Bourbon in a newspaper is 1826.
The next legend is that Evan Williams was the first registered distiller. Williams was an early distiller in Louisville and the legend comes because Reuben T. Durrett, one of the founders of the Filson Historical Society, wanted the first of many things to be a Kentuckian. The fact is that the first registered distiller came from the Whiskey Rebellion, the law that created the requirement of registering distillers, and most likely the first distillery was probably somewhere in the east where the law was more easily enforced.
The Whiskey Rebellion brings us to the next legend. The legend is that the rebellion is what brought distillers to Kentucky. The fact is that Kentucky had plenty of distillers in the State before the rebellion. These distillers were also part of the rebellion. Why would a distiller pack up everything in Pennsylvania and move to Kentucky? During the time of the Whiskey Rebellion the Federal Marshals had just as much jurisdiction in Kentucky as they did in Pennsylvania. Those that had to flee the law fled to Spanish territory such as New Orleans.
The last legend I will look at is that Old Forester was the first bottled Bourbon. There were bottled Bourbons before 1870 when Old Forester was created. The earliest bottle I have seen referenced is from Bennigers Grocery store in New York City. Old Crow had a contest in the 1960s where they were hoping it would be an Old Crow bottle. It was not. The fact is that Old Forester is the first Bourbon sold only by the bottle.
There is nothing wrong with these legends in that they help distilleries sell whiskey. I always take these stories with a grain of salt and as long as the verified facts are out there, and people understand facts aren’t necessarily legend, I don’t see a problem with a few tall tales.













November 14, 2025 at 11:18 am
Nice post.
Not enough emphasis in the bourbon sphere is placed on the importance of Henry Crowgey’s 1968 doctoral dissertation which later became his book “Kentucky Bourbon: The Early Years of Whiskeymaking.”
He does a great job of providing a “fluff-free,” academic account of bourbon history.
Can’t see Heaven Hill dropping their Elijah Craig tagline despite it being complete nonsense. The truth isn’t all that alluring:
“We launched Elijah Craig in 1986. We chose Craig because he was already thought by many to be the father of bourbon. He was the most marketable myth available to us at the time.”
November 14, 2025 at 12:05 pm
Thank you. I agree with you about Crowgey. His book was one of the first Bourbon histories I read and to this day, I believe it is the best.
November 14, 2025 at 1:14 pm
Yours is a good read too. Keep up the fine work!
November 14, 2025 at 4:43 pm
Yes, but I like Crowgey because it was groundbreaking. He was doing Bourbon history before it was cool.
November 14, 2025 at 6:39 pm
I like how he didn’t treat the deeply flawed Collins “History of Kentucky” as gospel. It’s a great book. If he had the artistic flair of Gerald Carson, it’d be the perfect book.
November 14, 2025 at 7:33 pm
I agree that Collin’s is a good book for its time but history was written different in 1870 than today.
November 14, 2025 at 9:43 pm
I meant Crowgey’s book was good. The 2nd edition of Collin’s “History of Kentucky” is filled with lore and racism—a common problem with most historical accounts back then. I like how you, like Crowgey, cut through the noise. You’re also not an “influencer/faux expert” who started drinking bourbon 10 minutes ago.
November 15, 2025 at 5:31 am
Bottle + label the beginning of portable mass marketing of whiskey + brands. The first appeared in Ireland in the late 18th century, Bourbon followed in the late 1840s by east coast retailers and wholesalers.
https://thewhiskeywash.com/whiskey-styles/bourbon/early-bourbon-brands-made-leap-bulk-barrels-branded-bottles/
November 15, 2025 at 1:05 pm
I don’t know if the word “mass” applies to bourbon in the middle part of the 19th century. Bourbon was still very much a regional product. Mass-production glass plants didn’t exist, limiting production.
November 15, 2025 at 1:49 pm
Limiting production in glass bottles I meant.
It’s important to remember, having an “agent” in a city or town in the 19th century didn’t mean the product was readily available.
An agent was often someone willing to receive or list a product—not someone who necessarily sold it in large quantities.
It’s not like today where an agent network is strategic, coordinated, and consistent.
Whiskey “shipped” to Oregon, for example, would’ve been extremely inconsistent.